首页> 外文OA文献 >Screening Physical Activity in Family Practice: Validity of the Spanish Version of a Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire
【2h】

Screening Physical Activity in Family Practice: Validity of the Spanish Version of a Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire

机译:在家庭实践中筛查体育活动:简短的体育活动问卷西班牙语版的有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of brief screening tools to identify inactive patients is essential to improve the efficiencyof primary care-based physical activity (PA) programs. However, the current employmentof short PA questionnaires within the Spanish primary care pathway is unclear. Thisstudy evaluated the validity of the Spanish version of a Brief Physical Activity AssessmentTool (SBPAAT).MethodsA validation study was carried out within the EVIDENT project. A convenience sample ofpatients (n = 1,184; age 58.9±13.7 years; 60.5% female) completed the SBPAAT and the7-day Physical Activity Recall (7DPAR) and, in addition, wore an accelerometer (ActiGraphGT3X) for seven consecutive days. Validity was evaluated by measuring agreement,Kappa correlation coefficients, sensitivity and specificity in achieving current PA recommendationswith the 7DPAR. Pearson correlation coefficients with the number of daily minutesengaged in moderate and vigorous intensity PA according to the accelerometer were alsoassessed. Comparison with accelerometer counts, daily minutes engaged in sedentary,light, moderate, and vigorous intensity PA, total daily kilocalories, and total PA and ltime expenditure (METs-hour-week) between the sufficiently and insufficiently activegroups identified by SBPAAT were reported.ResultsThe SBPAAT identified 41.3%sufficiently active (n = 489) and 58.7% insufficiently active(n = 695) patients; it showed moderate validity (k = 0.454, 95% CI: 0.402–0.505) and aspecificity and sensitivity of 74.3%and 74.6%, respectively. Validity was fair for identifyingdaily minutes engaged in moderate (r = 0.215, 95% CI:0.156 to 0.272) and vigorous PA(r = 0.282, 95% CI:0.165 to 0.391). Insufficiently active patients according to the SBPAATsignificantly reported fewer counts/minute (-22%), fewer minutes/day of moderate (-11.38)and vigorous PA (-2.69), spent fewer total kilocalories/day (-753), and reported a lowerenergy cost (METs-hour-week) of physical activities globally (-26.82) and during leisuretime (-19.62).ConclusionsThe SBPAAT is a valid tool to identify Spanish-speaking patients who are insufficientlyactive to achieve health benefits.
机译:使用简短的筛查工具来识别不活跃的患者对于提高基于初级保健的身体活动(PA)计划的效率至关重要。但是,目前尚不清楚西班牙初级保健途径中是否使用了简短的PA问卷。本研究评估了简短的体育锻炼评估工具(SBPAAT)西班牙语版本的有效性。方法在EVIDENT项目中进行了验证研究。一个方便的患者样本(n = 1,184;年龄58.9±13.7岁;女性60.5%)完成了SBPAAT和7天体育锻炼回顾(7DPAR),此外,还连续7天佩戴了加速度计(ActiGraphGT3X)。通过测量协议,Kappa相关系数,敏感性和特异性来评估有效性,以7DPAR实现当前的PA推荐。还根据加速度计评估了皮尔逊相关系数与中等强度和剧烈强度PA每天的活动分钟数。报告比较了由SBPAAT确定的足够活跃和不活跃的人群之间的加速度计计数,静坐,轻度,中度和剧烈强度PA的每日分钟数,静坐,轻度,中度和剧烈运动的每日分钟数,每日总卡路里以及一次和一次的总支出(MET-hour-week)。 SBPAAT确定了41.3%的活动不足(n = 489)和58.7%的活动不足(n = 695)患者;它显示出中等有效性(k = 0.454,​​95%CI:0.402-0.505),特异性和敏感性分别为74.3%和74.6%。确认每天参加中度(r = 0.215,95%CI:0.156至0.272)和剧烈PA(r = 0.282,95%CI:0.165至0.391)的分钟数是合理的。根据SBPAAT,活动不足的患者显着报告了更少的计数/分钟(-22%),更少的分钟/天的中度(-11.38)和剧烈的PA(-2.69),花费的总卡路里/天(-753)较少,可以降低全球(-26.82)和休闲时间(-19.62)进行体育锻炼的能量成本(每周METs /小时)。结论SBPAAT是一种有效的工具,可以识别说西班牙语的患者,这些患者活动不足以取得健康益处。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号